Obama Asks for $1.1 Billion for Gun Control

Yup, you read that right! Our ever-so-economical president wants $1.1 BILLION to protect Americans from gun violence. $182 million of Obama’s request is to support the “Now Is The Time” gun safety initiative, which includes:

Image

Let’s take a closer look at these so-called “gun safety initiatives”. First, background checks are already required for any legal purchase of a firearm. This isn’t how criminals are getting a hold of guns. It’s people like Leland Yee who are illegally trafficking guns into the country and placing them into the hands of very bad people. This will happen regardless of what our background check requirements are. Do you think Senator Yee and ‘Shrimp Boy’ performed background checks on any of the Muslim rebels they so willingly armed?

Passing a stronger ban on assault weapons. Look, I’ve already done an article on how Obama, Feinstein, and other anti-gun advocates are misusing terms in order to scare uniformed American citizens into supporting their agenda. He wants to pass stronger bans on guns in general and will do so by manipulating you into thinking a modern day sporting rifle is a military weapon. Which in turn makes a legal gun an ‘assault weapon’.

Banning magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. I also mentioned this briefly in my post about misuse of guns terms, and I will mention it again. Limiting the amount of rounds a magazine can hold WILL NOT prevent or stop gun violence. Statistics say that criminals on average only fire about 4 rounds, which is well under the 10 rounds held in a supposed ‘dangerous’ magazine. Not to mention, PoliceOne did a survey in which 96% said that a ban on standard capacity magazines would not reduce crime. And last but not least, just because you have a limit on the amount of rounds your magazine can carry, doesn’t mean a criminal won’t have another fully loaded magazine on his/her person. An experienced shooter can unload and reload like it’s second nature.

Get “armor-piercing bullets off the streets”. Oh how I love this one. What exactly is an ‘armor-piercing bullet’? Where can I buy them? If I go to a store and ask for a box of armor-piercing bullets, will the counter clerk know exactly what I’m talking about? Not really, because there is no such thing. It is yet another term that Obama uses to scare you along with his favorite phrase “police are being out-gunned on the streets”. Which I also showed to my readers is not true in previous posts. Basically what Obama is wanting to “get off the streets” are regular bullets. You know, bullets that actually have more than 100 grains of powder and not the rinky-dink ones you use to practice at a shooting range. So not only is he going after guns, he is going after ammunition.

Giving law enforcement additional tools to prevent and prosecute gun crime. Ok, like what Mr. Obama? Another $382.1 million has been requested by the Department of Justice, $2 million of which will be for Smart Gun technology grants. Did you know that there have been recommendations for police officers to have access to Smart Guns owned by citizens? Yes that means that your little chip/bracelet/fingerprints can be overtaken by a band that any law-enforcement official can wear. They also would like to put GPS tracking devices in each Smart Gun. Now why would a gun need a tracking device? Could it be because the government wants to know exactly who owns a gun and where it is located so that they can confiscate at any given moment?

End the freeze on gun violence research. Seriously? End what freeze? You can do research any time you want to. All of the data, statistics, polls, and crime ratings are all there. It just doesn’t match up with his claims against guns, therefore he wants to make uniformed people believe that any of the research that has been released is invalid since apparently there is a freeze on the real research. Give me a break.

Make our schools safer. Ok fine. I’m all for my future children going to a safe school, but his definition of safe and mine are not the same. Being from Texas, I have heard all of the stories about Charles Whitman shooting from the clock tower at the University of Texas in 1966. Did you know that it wasn’t just police officers who fired back? Other armed citizens, both students of UT and locals around the area at the time opened fire. A couple of these citizens even went with the officers into the tower to get to Whitman. With the extra help from these armed citizens, lives of students, faculty, and even police officers were put at a lesser risk. Because of the return fire from multiple directions, Whitman was forced to hide behind a wall to avoid shots which in turn prevented him from having good aim to harm any other people.Taking guns away and providing counseling instead is not going to help make schools any safer.

Lastly, of course he has to enter ObamaCare into his anti-gun plan. Don’t even get me started on that one.

To wrap up my post, why are we going to spend money we don’t have? Our country is already trillions of dollars in debt, yet he wants to spend another billion to take away our Constitutional right? How about we use that money to REMOVE laws that infringe on Americans’ Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms instead and be done with it.

Advertisements

Are NJ Gun Laws and CA Senators Trafficking Scheme Connected?

As most of you know from reading about recent events, California State Senator and gun-control advocate Leland Yee was arrested yesterday for accepting campaign donations in exchange for trafficking automatic weapons, missiles, and rockets to the Muslim rebels in the Philippines. What you haven’t heard is that the cargo ship filled with these high-artillery weapons was scheduled to dock at Newark Port in New Jersey.

If the weapons on the cargo ship were to be delivered to those involved, why not directly ship from Russia to the Philippines? Wouldn’t that have lessened the risk for exposure? If Yee’s plan was to ship weapons from Russia to the Philippines for the sole reason of supplying heavy artillery to an Islamic terrorist group, then why would the cargo ship come to the US? Or more importantly, why New Jersey? If you ask me, that is a long way in the wrong direction if his plan was to go down the way he claims. Which is where I get suspicious and you should too.

Looking at recent events in New Jersey- A law has recently passed limiting the sales and/or ownership of a high-capacity magazine (over 10 rounds) and the state is further pushing the matter that guns should be banned in general.

If Yee was looking to supply weaponry to radical Islamists in the Philippines, what makes you think he wouldn’t be looking to supply these same weapons to radicals in our own country? Why he would do this is simple- If he were to see to it that these weapons would be imported to criminal entities in the streets of New Jersey, this could create more gun violence ultimately leading to MORE GUN CONTROL. Fact is, groups like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood are waging “civilization jihad” against our Constitution to gradually implement Sharia Law on Americans through Muslim judges and anti-gun leftists.

Which makes you wonder- Where any New Jersey politicians involved as well? It wouldn’t surprise me.

This past February, CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations)-NJ chose Mohamed Al Filali as their new leader.

He was also the chairman of the American Muslim Union’s Chapters Committee from 1999 to 2001. Mahmoud was on the executive board of the Muslim Arab Youth Association, a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity, at the same time that the FBI learned of Islamist rhetoric at its events”

Then you have NJ Governor Chris Christie. Don’t let the Republican title fool you. He is a sympathizer of Hamas (a terrorist organization), he appointed a pro-Islamist judge by the name of Sohail Mohammed (who also has questionable ties to Hamas, and in July of 2012 Christie welcomed Imam Qatannani at an Iftar dinner that was held at the governor’s mansion. Qatannani was arrested by the Israeli government and convicted of terrorism, and was threatened to be deported. Until Christie and Sohail Mohammed stepped in. Sohail Mohammed was Qatannani’s lawyer when he plead guilty to membership of Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Shall I also add that Qatannani both defends and supports a ‘charity’ that provides funds to children of suicide bombers? At the Iftar dinner, Christie introduced Qatannani and said that “in all [his] interactions with Imam over the years, he has always attempted to be a force of good… any people who have a problem with him are racist.” The original audio of Christie’s speech has been pulled from YouTube, but luckily for you, I still have it:

Next, you have Bill Pascrell, who is the U.S Representative for New Jersey’s 9th congressional district. A district, might I add, that is heavily populated with Palestinians who openly wear the Hamas scarf (keffiyeh). If you’re not familiar with what that is, the scarf (keffiyeh) is used to express that they are committed enemies of Israelis and Jewish peoples. Keffiyeh is a slogan to mean “Jerusalem is our’s- WE ARE COMING!”

Tell me- If these individuals were given a free weapon, do you think there would be any hesitation in killing Jewish people? Or any people for that matter if to further assist towards their agenda? Do you not see that there is a growing threat of Islamic Jihad GROWING FAST in our country? That’s including our leaders!

To think that our guns could be taken away and placed in the hands of these people is sickening. What’s even more disturbing is that you don’t see what’s happening right in front of you. We have senators, congressmen, and US representatives that are in bed with Muslim terrorist groups. What do they all have in common? They want to disarm law-abiding citizens and take over this country. How will they do that? BY MAKING YOU THINK GUN CONTROL IS A GREAT IDEA.

If this sounds crazy to you then fine. Stay asleep at the wheel and watch your whole world crash and burn before your eyes. But before you do, answer me this-

Why is NO ONE talking about the cargo ship that was set to dock in New Jersey?

Is this all a matter of coincidence and poor timing when taking the New Jersey gun laws into play?

Why are the American people no longer asking questions about their government?

Finally, take another look at the affidavit that I posted yesterday. The undercover FBI agent is telling Yee (look pages 98-101) he has connections to the port of NJ, and assures Yee that he can ship the weapons there. While reading this, I asked myself “What connections did he have there and why would they ship them there?” Something was left out, but because the big, bad Yee was arrested, everyone thinks this is no longer an issue.

Democratic Senator Charged In Gun Trafficking Scheme With Muslim Rebels

California State Senator and gun-control advocate, Leland Yee, has been indicted on charges related to gun trafficking. FBI Special Agent, Emmanuel Pascua, filed a 137 page sworn affidavit (view full version here) outlining his charges, which included that Yee’s gun trafficking involved Muslim rebels in the Philippines, or more specifically, Mindanao. 

Image

According to the affidavit, Keith Jackson (political consultant and Yee’s alleged partner in crime) contacted the undercover FBI agent on March 4, 2014 to set up a meeting and discuss Yee’s request to find a new weapons supplier. At the meeting the next day, the FBI agent identified Dr. LIM as the point of contact in the weapons deal between the Yee and the Philippines.

During the meeting between Yee and the undercover agent, Senator Yee explained how Dr. LIM was originally from the Mindanao region and that Muslim rebels had no issue with kidnapping, murdering, or holding individuals for ransom in exchange for money in order to successfully overthrow their government. 

The undercover agent and Yee then went on to discuss weapons such as shoulder-fire missles and/or rocks and semi-automatics. Yee was told he would be given $2 million in cash to pay for high-powered artillery and the shipment of weapons to North Africa (most likely to be sold to Muslim rebels for the same reason). 

Why would someone do this? The surface answer is simple– Yee is running for CA Secretary of State. Because of this, he willingly engaged in soliciting illegal campaign donations in exchange for trafficking firearms from Russia to the US to sell to Muslim rebels in the Philippines. But what about what’s underneath? So many people can easily forget about the whole thing in a couple of weeks because they don’t see that there is an underlying problem here.

Look at page 101 of the affidavit where Yee claimed that the Philippine government was secretly funding Muslim groups in order to create a distraction from government corruption. Do these points not add up to something strangely similar to the gun-running operation that put weapons staight into the hands of Mexican drug cartels? Wake up people. You have a Democratic State Senator who is willing to aid an Islamist terrorist group all for the sake of funding his own campaign. He was caught and his story is out in the open, but are you honestly not willing to admit there are most likely more of the same scumbags out there that our state/country elected?! Do you not think there was another motive behind this? This gun-control advocate lied through his teeth. He doesn’t oppose guns, he opposes guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens! 

Lies, hypocrisy, deceipt. All reasons why we need to start asking why senators, congressmen, law makers, and our president all want to disarm America.

Image

Scary thing is, it is possible that like Yee, we have more “leaders” trying to get you to buy into the lies about gun violence. Why? So that you’ll fight their battle to disarm America. Why? Because like the Muslim rebels in the Philippines, we have people in power who want to overthrow a large body. It looks to me that in America’s case it’s not the government these leaders are looking to destroy, it’s the people.