Guns are easier to buy than fresh veggies and books


President Obama vented about his failed attempt to increase background checks at a town hall event in South Carolina last Friday. His mockery of gun rights activists wasn’t surprising, but the fact that he stated that guns are easier to purchase than vegetables and books is insane.

As long as you can go in some neighborhoods and it is easier for you to buy a firearm than it is for you to buy a book, there are neighborhoods where it is easier for you to buy a handgun and clips than it is for you to buy a fresh vegetable, as long as that’s the case, we’re going to continue to see unnecessary violence,

Last time I checked, I don’t have to fill out a stack of paper work and wait at the counter for 30 minutes while I have a background check performed every time I head to the local grocery store to buy fresh veggies. Last time I went to a library or book store, I was not asked for my photo ID, my car registration, along with other forms to provide as proof of residency. I was not told I couldn’t purchase a book because I haven’t lived in my state for more than 60 days. I did not have to provide my finger print or give my reason as to why I wanted to purchase that book. Saying that purchasing a gun is easier than things we purchase on a daily basis is just another statement made in hopes of scaring those who are less informed.

Last time I checked, I was not given a list of questions to answer regarding my criminal history and citizenship. No Obama, it is not easier to purchase a firearm than it is to purchase books and food.

There are two problems with this.

1) You may be thinking “yes, but he isn’t talking about the average citizen. He is talking about areas where criminals can buy guns from other criminals just like we can buy groceries at the grocery store”. Exactly. He isn’t talking about the ‘average citizen’ so why is he advocating to make MORE restrictions and more extensive requirements for the average Joe to purchase a gun. Criminals who buy or steal guns from other criminals are already avoiding background checks. So how will performing more extensive background checks decrease the number of guns in the hands of criminal people? It won’t. These laws and background checks are only effecting those who actually follow them.

2) Criminals having access to illegal firearms isn’t as easy as you think, and it is definitely not as easy to obtain as everyday grocery items. It is, yet again, another thing for Obama and other gun control advocates to say to you to put fear into the minds of American people. Not to mention, if less gun control laws were implemented on innocent people, criminals would have more of a reason to fear those around them. After all, if guns are allowed, how do they know who will fight back?

Obama then goes on to say that they have been trying to reduce the number of available guns and that Sandy Hook should have motivated people to get things done. Because that wasn’t enough of a motivator, our homicide rate continues to increase. Where exactly is he getting this information from and why are people automatically agreeing without fact-checking?

Here is a 5 year graph reflecting violent crime rates from 2009-2013, provided by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.


We can also look at larger figures, dating all the way back from 1992. From 1992 to 2011, our homicide rate decreased from 9.3% to 4.7%.

Not only are homicide rates down, but crime rates in general.

The CDC also reports that death per firearms in 2013 was only 3.5%.

Read more about how 2013 crime rates are actually HURTING the gun control campaign.

So before you jump on the Obama bandwagon and come out with gun control anthems, do your research. Everything that Obama claims is true about guns and gun violence is not correct.

Gay Rights VS Gun Rights: Which is more dangerous to society?

I feel like from the title alone I am going to get a mass of angry emails. But regardless of how many people decide to yell at me for this post, it still makes me wonder.

Reading this article before continuing may offer a better understanding of why I posted this and how I am making this connection:


Total death by firearm (homicide, accidental, suicidal, and self-defense) each year is estimated at around 11,000 people, according to the CDC.

Also according to the CDC, there were almost 50,000 NEW cases of HIV/AIDS in the year 2011 alone and over 1.3 million people today who are diagnosed with HIV/AIDS (not including those who do not know they have it). The number of deaths associated with HIV/AIDS is estimated at 8,369 per year. To add to that, nearly 7,000 homosexual men die each year from HIV/AIDS. Then considering an additional 40,000-50,000 NEW cases each year, this only adds to the amount of homosexual men and women who will eventually die due to this disease. Aside from this, homosexuals and liberals are still putting ALL of their focus into allowing same-sex marriage because gay men and women should be allowed to EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT to love and marry anyone they want. Although, I don’t know where this ‘right’ came from. This is a right that they believe they have developed over the years, not necessarily a right that has been written down for government not to intervene.

Yes, the number of deaths by HIV/AIDS is still less than death by firearms. However, if you take out deaths from handguns, the death from rifles and shotguns combined is lower than the deaths from HIV/AIDS each year. Anyways, so let’s look at something else now- Suicide and self-harm are another factor. The Stonewall 2012 Survey discovered that 3% of gay men and 5% of bisexual men had attempted to take their own life, compared to only 0.4% of men in general. The rate for suicide is MUCH higher in homosexual men. When looking at self-inflicted harm, here are similar findings. 7% of gay and bisexual men had deliberately harmed themselves compared to only 3% of men in general, and in the 16- to 24-year-old age group, 15% of gay and bisexual men had harmed themselves compared to 7% of men in general.

Next we have murder, domestic violence, and hate crime.

In 2010, 6,628 hate crime incidents, involving 7,699 offenses
and 8,208 victims, were reported to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation by local law enforcement agencies.

Hate Crime

So in 2010, there were a total of 8,208 victims of hate-inspired crime, 19.3% of which were geared towards sexual orientation. That means that in 2010, about 1,560 homosexuals were victims of hate crime. This number increased to 2,016 incidents reported and 25 homicides in 2012.


Now all of that aside, what is everyone doing in order to confront this issue and end violence against homosexuals? They are attacking the culture. They are attacking the “old-fashioned” view that being homosexual is wrong/dirty/sacrilegious. In general, America has an extremely violent culture which in turn leads individuals to resort to violence. We have homosexual awareness rallies, we have government funded screenings to help educate and prevent HIV/AIDS, and we have people encouraging them to EXERCISE THEIR RIGHTS. Which, I’m sorry if this offends anyone but last time I checked ‘gay rights’ was not protected by the Constitution. At most, one could argue that the Constitution protects one’s privacy and even that’s a stretch. All in all, people are fighting for gay rights because people believe that we should have the right to make our own decisions. With guns, instead of attacking the culture, they are attacking the weapon and the people who own them. Tell me, if being homosexual is life-threatening and dangerous ALSO due to the increased risk of disease, suicide, depression/mental instability, and hate crime then why is owning a gun not approached in the same way?

This doesn’t make any sense to me. How can you expect us to support your choices and what you choose to do with your life, but want to restrict us from making choices of our own? We shouldn’t be attacking law-abiding gun owners. We should be attacking the culture that is encouraging people to act violently. We should be attacking the criminals who are hurting people. You’re attacking them for hurting homosexuals, why aren’t you attacking them for using a gun? Do you want to know why I have a gun? Because I KNOW this country is violent and I want to protect myself from it. I know we have criminals on the street with what seems to be the result of little consequences and being let out of jail early on ‘good behavior’. Would I need a gun if there was no murderers, rapists, or other horrible people out there? No. Honestly, I probably wouldn’t have ever thought about getting one.

Whether or not I agree or disagree, support or don’t support homosexuality and same-sex marriage is not my point here. My point is that you are asking us to support your decision and your right when it kills a large number of people each year as well. My second point is that I don’t want to hear that you are in favor of gun-control because of the amount of gun-related deaths each year. If you are truly concerned about death, you wouldn’t support homosexuals yet you do anyway.